3 ms·
The attached post feels AI-generated/AI-edited. I don’t know why that detracts from the usefulness of this utility, but it — at least how I’m reacting to it — s
by gortok 10mo ago
The attached post feels AI-generated/AI-edited. I don’t know why that detracts from the usefulness of this utility, but it — at least how I’m reacting to it — seems to.
For me, it reads as not having any soul to it, as well as changing who its target reader is throughout the post. The choice of emphasis comes across weirdly too.
I think this is a wonderful tool, but whether it’s because the author uses AI to help them write this post, or that there’s AI edited content everywhere now, I’m weary of reading and trusting something that reads like this post does.
I don’t know if this is overblown or meta-commentary on the state of online posts these days, but it’s how I’m feeling, more and more, when I see online writings.
- ofek 10mo agoThe post is entirely authentic; it matches the writing style of the author from before the LLM boom and discusses work that the human author recently released. Can you pinpoint what makes you feel that way? edit: I asked for explanation before the post was edited to expand on that. I disagree but am sympathetic to the weariness of reading content now that AI use is widespread.
- petcat 10mo agoThese kinds of comments (accusing OC of being ai gen) seem like they're showing up in every thread and they're always useless and insulting. HN needs a rule to ban these