4 ms·
"Sharp Monocular View Synthesis in Less Than a Second" "Less than a second" is not "instantly".
by hermitcrab 10mo ago
"Sharp Monocular View Synthesis in Less Than a Second"
"Less than a second" is not "instantly".
- ethmarks 10mo agoWhat would your definition of "instantly" be? I would argue that, compared to taking minutes or hours, taking less than a second is fast enough to be considered "instant" in the colloquial definition. I'll concede that it's not "instant" in the literal definition, but nothing is (because of the principle of locality).
- cubefox 10mo agoWittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations, §88: > (...) Now, if I tell someone: "You should come to dinner more punctually; you know it begins at one o'clock exactly"—is there really no question of exactness here? because it is possible to say: "Think of the determination of time in the laboratory or the observatory; there you see what 'exactness' means"? "Inexact" is really a reproach, and "exact" is praise. (...)
- 0_____0 10mo agoIf you're concerned by that, I have some bad news about instant noodles.
- reaperducer 10mo agoFolgers on line one.