3 ms·
The comment isn't infamous because it was petty or nitpicking. It's because the comment was so poorly communicated and because the author was so profoundly out-
by closewith 10mo ago
The comment isn't infamous because it was petty or nitpicking. It's because the comment was so poorly communicated and because the author was so profoundly out-of-touch with the average person that they had lost all perspective.
It's why it caught the zeitgeist at the time and why it's still apropos in this conversation now.
- latexr 10mo ago> It's because the comment was so poorly communicated and because the author was so profoundly out-of-touch with the average person that they had lost all perspective. None of those things are true. Which is the point I’m making. Go read the original conversation. All of it. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224 Don’t skip Brandon’s reply. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9479 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9479 It is absurd to claim that someone who quickly understood the explanation, learned from it, conceded where they were wrong, is somehow “profoundly out-of-touch” and “lost all perspective”. It’s the exact opposite. I agree with Dan that we’d be lucky if all conversations were like that.
- closewith 10mo agoI think you should take your own advice and re-read the conversation without your pre-conceived conclusion. Ironically your own overly verbose and aggressive comments here fall into the same trap.