3 ms·

I agree apart from the learning part. The thing is unless you have some very specific needs where you need to use ffmpeg a lot, there’s just no need to learn th

I agree apart from the learning part. The thing is unless you have some very specific needs where you need to use ffmpeg a lot, there’s just no need to learn this stuff. If I have to touch it once a year I have much better things to spend my time learning than ffmpeg command

serial_dev 10mo ago
There is no universe where I would like to spend brain power on learning ffmpeg commands by heart.
- skydhash 10mo ago
  No one learns those. What people do is just learning the UX of the cli and the terminology (codec, opus, bitrate, sampling,…)
rolfus 10mo ago
Agreed. I have a bunch of little command-line apps that I use 0.3 to 3 times a year* and I'm never going to memorize the commands or syntax for those. I'll be happy to remember the names of these tools, so I can actually find them on my own computer. * - Just a few days ago I used ImageMagick for the first time in at least three years. I downloaded it just to find that I already had it installed.
lukeschlather 10mo ago
The thing about ffmpeg is there's no substitute for learning. It's pretty common that something simple like "ff convert" simply doesn't work and you have to learn about resolution, color space, profiles, or container formats. An LLM can help but earlier this year I spent a lot of time looking at these sorts of edge cases, and I can easily make any LLM wildly hallucinate by asking questions about how to use ffmpeg to handle particular files.