5 ms·
The article didn't say how accurate the predictions were. Too bad, that's the important part.
by why-o-why 10mo ago
The article didn't say how accurate the predictions were. Too bad, that's the important part.
- hirako2000 10mo agoBecause there is no admitting what was found were predictions. Millions of entities, that will take years to verify the data. The interview is funny: when the winner was asked how he did it: I took that NASA database, and made the computer think... No more concrete. Oh yes they said AI and infrared, he even used infrared.
- tzs 10mo agoThe second paragraph of the article contains a link straight to the paper, which is open access.
- moffkalast 10mo agoAll they know is his gut says maybe.