4 ms·
Ok but then that would seem to absolve the manufacturer of liability. If you sell someone a hammer and they try to eat it the manufacturer isn’t liable for the
by mattmaroon 10mo ago
Ok but then that would seem to absolve the manufacturer of liability. If you sell someone a hammer and they try to eat it the manufacturer isn’t liable for the damage.
- mikkupikku 10mo agoIf the product is defective and misused when somebody gets hurt, I don't think the manufacturer is totally in the clear morally, or even legally.
- pixl97 10mo agoCool, let's ban the product and kill thousands more people than they save. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good when good is increasing lifespans and reducing bad outcomes.
- array_key_first 10mo agoI mean, you don't ban the product, we don't do this generally. But you do make the manufacturer change their language or advertisment.
- pixl97 10mo agoHave you ever read the book of papers that come with a CGM?
- mikkupikku 10mo agoBro I'm not calling for anything to be banned, I'm responding to the sentiment that the story doesn't make sense because users of CGMs should know better.
- mattmaroon 10mo agoIs it defective if it tells you it may make mistakes and must be verified and then it makes a mistake?