Well, no. Because authors do two things typically when they use an LLM for editing: - iterate multiple rounds - approve the final edit as their message I ca

Well, no. Because authors do two things typically when they use an LLM for editing: - iterate multiple rounds - approve the final edit as their message I can’t do either of those things myself — and your post implicitly assumes there’s underlying content prior to the LLM process; but it’s likely to be iterated interactions with an LLM that produces content at all — ie, there never exists a human-written rough draft or single prompt for you to read, either. So your example is a lose-lose-lose: there never was a non-LLM text for you to read; I have no way to recreate the author’s ideas; and the author has been shamed into not publishing because it doesn’t match your aesthetics. Your post is a classic example of demanding everyone lose out because something isn’t to your taste.