4 ms·

I agree. My point was only that this hole can easily be patched in X as well. So the argument was essentially "we do not bother to patch it with X, so we must r

by uecker 10mo ago

I agree. My point was only that this hole can easily be patched in X as well. So the argument was essentially "we do not bother to patch it with X, so we must rewrite X".

eptcyka 10mo ago
It was my understanding that changing the original codebase to fix it would’ve been involved enough as to warrant a rewrite.
- uecker 10mo ago
  I think this is nonsense.