3 ms·
Not really, you can't. For example, you might have a service that lies dormant using 0.1mb of memory and then does some scanning/maintenance once a week and use
by eviks 10mo ago
Not really, you can't. For example, you might have a service that lies dormant using 0.1mb of memory and then does some scanning/maintenance once a week and uses 50% CPU for 5 minues with 100m memory.
Also, checking those dozens of services will take a lot of time
Unsuspecting users can't even measure space savings correctly since many components can be hardlinked to something else and deleting them will "free up" the space shown in the folder (the size standard size reporting on Windows is deeply inadequate), but not free up anything in reality.
Or for some uwp apps you can't even see the size at all as the folders have a very dumb permission set, and these scripts remove those preinstalled uwp apps.
That's the point of public benchmarking - so that ever single user doesn't have to waste time doing the mistaken comparisons on his own, so your suggestion doesn't help at all even in theory.
- fuzzfactor 10mo agoI recognized the weakness of that theory to begin with. But at least in practice I can run challenging software that would not otherwise run. Plus outperform those having more powerful hardware. Regardless, it would be good to see a worthwhile suggestion when it comes to public benchmarks.