3 ms·
Your reference to Debian stable made me curious. Do you think that has less disruption than only installing Ubuntu LTS releases? I haven't used Debian after sw
by pedrocr 14y ago
Your reference to Debian stable made me curious. Do you think that has less disruption than only installing Ubuntu LTS releases?
I haven't used Debian after switching to Ubuntu pretty early on. These days I stick to LTS on servers but can't resist upgrading to the latest shiny stuff every 6 months. I've had issues with upgrades and assumed that if I had stayed in the LTS path only it would be smoother.
By the way Ubuntu releases an LTS release every two years and the last 3 Debian stable releases have happened at 2 year intervals, so the two seem comparable.
- nvmc 14y agoDebian stable has far less disruption than Ubuntu LTS in my experience. There are very frequent updates to LTS releases. Often big ones too. That being said, Debian stable can sometimes feel a little... stale. Sorry. Couldn't help myself.