Very interesting article! For me, the reason for reaching for the “backwards” version first is that it wasn’t as clear to me that the “forward” version makes a

Very interesting article! For me, the reason for reaching for the “backwards” version first is that it wasn’t as clear to me that the “forward” version makes a uniform distribution. Even after reading the article. I appreciated the comment here about inserting a card at a random location, but that also isn’t quite right, because you swap cards not insert. Nevertheless, that did it for me.