> So kind of the opposite of what you're suggesting. I don’t think they’re opposites. It seems orthogonal to me. If you have a bunch of remote execution worke

> So kind of the opposite of what you're suggesting. I don’t think they’re opposites. It seems orthogonal to me. If you have a bunch of remote execution workers then ideally they sit idle on a full (shallow) clone of the repo. There should be no reason to reset between jobs. And definitely no reason to constantly refetch content.