4 ms·

Maybe the "far right" is a good description. E.g. AfD. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_f%C3%BCr_Deutschland#Treffen_mit_Vertretern_rechtsextremer_und_

by snowpid 10mo ago

Maybe the "far right" is a good description. E.g. AfD. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_f%C3%BCr_Deutschland#Treffen_mit_Vertretern_rechtsextremer_und_identit%C3%A4rer_Bewegungen https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_f%C3%BCr_Deutschla...

miroljub 10mo ago
Which of actual AfD policies are actually far right? EDIT: I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime.
- gloryjulio 10mo ago
  Whitewashing nazi issues(not the casual nazi labels we have seen these days, but the actual Nazi Germany) would be considered far right
  - miroljub 10mo ago
    Calling everyone you don’t are far right and nazi is belittling of the real nazis. Edit since I can’t answer: I’m not referring to this thread. It’s German regime outlets calling their opponents Nazis and far right.
    - gloryjulio 10mo ago
      I am saying the act of whitewashing nazi issues(not the casual nazi labels we have seen these days, but the actual Nazi Germany) would be considered far right. Do you agree that this happened? No one is calling everyone nazi in this thread. Who are you referring to?
    - gloryjulio 10mo ago
      To you edit: Again, you are ignoring the issue I raised: Whitewashing nazi issues(not the casual nazi labels we have seen these days, but the actual Nazi Germany) would be considered far right. This is about the actual fact about whitewashing the actual historical Nazi Germany. So I would take it as you are dodging the question and you are agreeing with my previous criteria: The people or organization whitewashing the actual historical Nazi Germany issues would be considered as far right.
- snowpid 10mo ago
  you are here https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/afd-verfassungsschutz-rechtsextremismus-100.html https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/afd-verfassung... "EDIT: I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime" Maybe they just publish what you don't like. They are a left outlet but certainly not pro government.
- saubeidl 10mo ago
  https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/19/turmoil-in-germany-over-neo-nazi-mass-deportation-meeting-explained https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/19/turmoil-in-ger...
- master-lincoln 10mo ago
  Not sure about their policies, but there have been many expressions from AfD politicians which are not in line with the German constitution. https://afd-verbot.de/beweise https://afd-verbot.de/beweise
  - sunaookami 10mo ago
    The current government constantly violates the consitution, they are still trying to implement Vorratsdatenspeicherung which was ruled illegal by the constitutional court. The former government tried to change how elections work with the goal of kicking out opposition parties. And for the current elections there still wasn't a needed re-count because the organisation that needs to approve a re-count is the current government themselves. How is any of that in line with the consitution? It's ever only an argument when it's the "side I don't like".
    - miroljub 10mo ago
      It’s funny when people blame opposition for things regime says they would do if they come to power, but tolerate all autocratic tendencies of the current regime. The self-elected one, as you point out. Edit: self-approved is better term, since without recount of votes we still don’t know if current regime has a majority.
- ben_w 10mo ago
  > EDIT: I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime. Well, if you ignore all the evidence you consider inconvenient, you could, you know, read their own self-description as "right wing" and combine that with the observation of them being too right wing for the other right wing parties.
- kergonath 10mo ago
  > Which of actual AfD policies are actually far right? What about most of them? Just look at who they are teaming with in the European Parliament. Or what they say about themselves. That should give you a hint. > I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime. Right. It’s just what (((they))) want you to believe.
  - miroljub 10mo ago
    So, you don’t like their coalition parters in the eu parliament? And you didn’t list a single far right policy of AfD. How about just naming one actual far right AfD policy so we can bring discussion from feeling back to facts.
    - snowpid 10mo ago
      I named various one of them and other provide some links.. You just called the AfD pro-jewish party while most jews despite the party. I think you might just be to check the sources.

by snowpid 10mo ago

miroljub 10mo ago

Which of actual AfD policies are actually far right? EDIT: I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime.

gloryjulio 10mo ago
Whitewashing nazi issues(not the casual nazi labels we have seen these days, but the actual Nazi Germany) would be considered far right
- miroljub 10mo ago
  Calling everyone you don’t are far right and nazi is belittling of the real nazis. Edit since I can’t answer: I’m not referring to this thread. It’s German regime outlets calling their opponents Nazis and far right.
  - gloryjulio 10mo ago
    I am saying the act of whitewashing nazi issues(not the casual nazi labels we have seen these days, but the actual Nazi Germany) would be considered far right. Do you agree that this happened? No one is calling everyone nazi in this thread. Who are you referring to?
  - gloryjulio 10mo ago
    To you edit: Again, you are ignoring the issue I raised: Whitewashing nazi issues(not the casual nazi labels we have seen these days, but the actual Nazi Germany) would be considered far right. This is about the actual fact about whitewashing the actual historical Nazi Germany. So I would take it as you are dodging the question and you are agreeing with my previous criteria: The people or organization whitewashing the actual historical Nazi Germany issues would be considered as far right.
snowpid 10mo ago
you are here https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/afd-verfassungsschutz-rechtsextremismus-100.html https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/afd-verfassung... "EDIT: I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime" Maybe they just publish what you don't like. They are a left outlet but certainly not pro government.
saubeidl 10mo ago
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/19/turmoil-in-germany-over-neo-nazi-mass-deportation-meeting-explained https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/jan/19/turmoil-in-ger...
master-lincoln 10mo ago
Not sure about their policies, but there have been many expressions from AfD politicians which are not in line with the German constitution. https://afd-verbot.de/beweise https://afd-verbot.de/beweise
- sunaookami 10mo ago
  The current government constantly violates the consitution, they are still trying to implement Vorratsdatenspeicherung which was ruled illegal by the constitutional court. The former government tried to change how elections work with the goal of kicking out opposition parties. And for the current elections there still wasn't a needed re-count because the organisation that needs to approve a re-count is the current government themselves. How is any of that in line with the consitution? It's ever only an argument when it's the "side I don't like".
  - miroljub 10mo ago
    It’s funny when people blame opposition for things regime says they would do if they come to power, but tolerate all autocratic tendencies of the current regime. The self-elected one, as you point out. Edit: self-approved is better term, since without recount of votes we still don’t know if current regime has a majority.
ben_w 10mo ago
> EDIT: I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime. Well, if you ignore all the evidence you consider inconvenient, you could, you know, read their own self-description as "right wing" and combine that with the observation of them being too right wing for the other right wing parties.
kergonath 10mo ago
> Which of actual AfD policies are actually far right? What about most of them? Just look at who they are teaming with in the European Parliament. Or what they say about themselves. That should give you a hint. > I am ignoring this link since its main source is Corrective, propaganda outlet funded by the German regime. Right. It’s just what (((they))) want you to believe.
- miroljub 10mo ago
  So, you don’t like their coalition parters in the eu parliament? And you didn’t list a single far right policy of AfD. How about just naming one actual far right AfD policy so we can bring discussion from feeling back to facts.
  - snowpid 10mo ago
    I named various one of them and other provide some links.. You just called the AfD pro-jewish party while most jews despite the party. I think you might just be to check the sources.