3 ms·
The article contains the questions they asked. The questions are only asking about social media. Specifically whether social media is sufficiently regulated and
by fancyfredbot 10mo ago
The article contains the questions they asked. The questions are only asking about social media. Specifically whether social media is sufficiently regulated and whether political advertising should be allowed on social media.
It does not mention surveillance, and it's not about tech in general. The title is misleading. (Edit: the OP kindly updated the title and it's no longer misleading)
- bilbo0s 10mo agoI'm almost positive a lot of HN Users don't read the studies they comment on. They probably don't even read the articles. Which, ironically, given the topic of this post, speaks to the kinds of pathologies we find out on social media these days.
- andersa 10mo agoThe comments are often more interesting than the original articles.
- nis0s 9mo agoAdmittedly, I skimmed through the article, but there’s an ongoing discussion around regulation of biometrics, other personal indicators, and privacy (not covered in this article).