> I'm only objecting to the idea of a periodic repartition -- it seems inefficient, and according to the linked article, it takes the table out of service for a

> I'm only objecting to the idea of a periodic repartition -- it seems inefficient, and according to the linked article, it takes the table out of service for as much as 15 minutes, apparently on a daily basis. To me this sounds hacky and ad-hoc. The article was stating that by using pg_reorg to partition, the table will NOT be out of service for 15 minutes