4 ms·

The article mentions he was convicted of falsifying records. Kind of surprised Japan lets foreigners with criminal records stay in the country. And: At shells

by ilamont 10mo ago

The article mentions he was convicted of falsifying records. Kind of surprised Japan lets foreigners with criminal records stay in the country. And: At shells.com, his personal cloud computing platform, he’s quietly developing an unreleased AI agent system that hands artificial intelligence full control over a virtual machine: installing software, managing emails, and even handling purchases with a planned credit card integration. “What I’m doing with shells is giving AI a whole computer and free rein on the computer”, a brilliant idea, really. AI agents on steroids. Like managing other people's crypto, it seems like an idea that could actually blow up your face.

mschuster91 10mo ago
[flagged]
- deleted 10mo ago
  [deleted]
- anonymous908213 10mo ago
  Deporting criminals is in no way a new concept. In fact, it used to be commonplace to deport your own citizens, not just foreigners. The modern nation of Australia exists as a result of such a policy! Japan will certainly deport you for drug-related offenses or violent crimes, but like most places, white collar crime is not treated as "real crime", even though the impacts are usually more severe than a simple shoplifting or robbery. Incidentally, if Germany had deported a foreigner who led an attempted coup d'etat, perhaps it would have saved tens of millions of lives. The things people get away with a slap on the wrist for...
  - mschuster91 10mo ago
    > Deporting criminals is in no way a new concept. Whoops. Yeah, worded the original post badly. My intent was that it is relatively new that this is a policy under active (and heated) discussion. > In fact, it used to be commonplace to deport your own citizens, not just foreigners. The modern nation of Australia exists as a result of such a policy! Which just proves my last point... it's in almost all scenarios really really bad for the destination country. The Australian Indigenous people have been driven to the point of extinction by that policy. > Incidentally, if Germany had deported a foreigner who led an attempted coup d'etat, perhaps it would have saved tens of millions of lives. German here. I don't think it would have changed much. Sure, Hitler was undoubtedly charismatic... but even the most charismatic demagogue needs a desperate populace. If it weren't Hitler, someone else would have risen - a lot of powerful interests were aiming for the final collapse of the Weimar Republic, which is part of the reason why Hitler got off with a slap on the wrist, and part of the reason why he did get elected legitimately a decade later.
  - killingtime74 10mo ago
    Nit pick, Australia was founded on transportation, not deportation. Australia was not a foreign country until many years after.
- ilamont 10mo ago
  > Many countries have no issue with that, serving time is considered enough of a punishment. The idea of (especially mandatory) deporting of criminals is relatively new Paul McCartney would like to have a word with you. Not just Japan. For decades, SE Asian countries such as Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia have deported foreign convicts upon release and applied re-entry bans. It's not a new thing driven by right-wing politicians.

by ilamont 10mo ago

mschuster91 10mo ago

[flagged]

deleted 10mo ago
[deleted]
anonymous908213 10mo ago
Deporting criminals is in no way a new concept. In fact, it used to be commonplace to deport your own citizens, not just foreigners. The modern nation of Australia exists as a result of such a policy! Japan will certainly deport you for drug-related offenses or violent crimes, but like most places, white collar crime is not treated as "real crime", even though the impacts are usually more severe than a simple shoplifting or robbery. Incidentally, if Germany had deported a foreigner who led an attempted coup d'etat, perhaps it would have saved tens of millions of lives. The things people get away with a slap on the wrist for...
- mschuster91 10mo ago
  > Deporting criminals is in no way a new concept. Whoops. Yeah, worded the original post badly. My intent was that it is relatively new that this is a policy under active (and heated) discussion. > In fact, it used to be commonplace to deport your own citizens, not just foreigners. The modern nation of Australia exists as a result of such a policy! Which just proves my last point... it's in almost all scenarios really really bad for the destination country. The Australian Indigenous people have been driven to the point of extinction by that policy. > Incidentally, if Germany had deported a foreigner who led an attempted coup d'etat, perhaps it would have saved tens of millions of lives. German here. I don't think it would have changed much. Sure, Hitler was undoubtedly charismatic... but even the most charismatic demagogue needs a desperate populace. If it weren't Hitler, someone else would have risen - a lot of powerful interests were aiming for the final collapse of the Weimar Republic, which is part of the reason why Hitler got off with a slap on the wrist, and part of the reason why he did get elected legitimately a decade later.
- killingtime74 10mo ago
  Nit pick, Australia was founded on transportation, not deportation. Australia was not a foreign country until many years after.
ilamont 10mo ago
> Many countries have no issue with that, serving time is considered enough of a punishment. The idea of (especially mandatory) deporting of criminals is relatively new Paul McCartney would like to have a word with you. Not just Japan. For decades, SE Asian countries such as Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia have deported foreign convicts upon release and applied re-entry bans. It's not a new thing driven by right-wing politicians.