4 ms·

"individual über alles" fails to account for "solidarity". As Dumas* would retort, « Tous pour un, un pour tous. » lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=

"individual über alles" fails to account for "solidarity". As Dumas* would retort, « Tous pour un, un pour tous. » lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO5wpeYSotg https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WO5wpeYSotg * https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Les_Trois_Mousquetaires/Chapitre_9 https://fr.wikisource.org/wiki/Les_Trois_Mousquetaires/Chapi...

gsf_emergency_6 10mo ago
Bizness busyness merry crismez! Here just to note that we seem indeed to be getting somewhere, (+according to Arnol'd, Varchenko discovered?/invented? mixed Hodge* structures so he could deal with oscillatory integrals. those lowly monsters that feature in many a baby phyker's trauma.. Pp12-13 https://m.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&paperid=7160&option_lang=eng https://m.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&... So, independently of Deligne, which the francophone VIA didn't want to offend? ) More later! *Hodge as the Grassmann of XXI?
- aebtebeten 10mo ago
  Excellent! (just looking at the figures, for some reason it reminds me a bit of René Thom and catastrophe theory)
- aebtebeten 10mo ago
  of course it reminds me of Thom; it's talking about ОСОБЕННОСТИ after all... TIL VIA's title is a shout out to [Hamilton1828] ANV isn't even Erdős-metabolically-challenged; have you been in contact? (Hodge would surely be XX, no? [nice Hodge star, though!])
  - gsf_emergency_6 10mo ago
    Grassmann needed Weyl in XX. Hodge star can be ID'd as "i" on the plane some versions of Gemini have no idea of the Whitney tuck.. (Prigogine didn't put a name to the concept either?)
    - aebtebeten 10mo ago
      The old fashioned tech doesn't do much better; I did an image search on '"whitney tuck" cusp' and got back a picture of a VIA monograph. At least it was relevant! Pedantic exception: "Text" is good; "hypertext" is better

gsf_emergency_6 10mo ago

Bizness busyness merry crismez! Here just to note that we seem indeed to be getting somewhere, (+according to Arnol'd, Varchenko discovered?/invented? mixed Hodge* structures so he could deal with oscillatory integrals. those lowly monsters that feature in many a baby phyker's trauma.. Pp12-13 https://m.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&paperid=7160&option_lang=eng https://m.mathnet.ru/php/archive.phtml?wshow=paper&jrnid=rm&... So, independently of Deligne, which the francophone VIA didn't want to offend? ) More later! *Hodge as the Grassmann of XXI?

aebtebeten 10mo ago
Excellent! (just looking at the figures, for some reason it reminds me a bit of René Thom and catastrophe theory)
aebtebeten 10mo ago
of course it reminds me of Thom; it's talking about ОСОБЕННОСТИ after all... TIL VIA's title is a shout out to [Hamilton1828] ANV isn't even Erdős-metabolically-challenged; have you been in contact? (Hodge would surely be XX, no? [nice Hodge star, though!])
- gsf_emergency_6 10mo ago
  Grassmann needed Weyl in XX. Hodge star can be ID'd as "i" on the plane some versions of Gemini have no idea of the Whitney tuck.. (Prigogine didn't put a name to the concept either?)
  - aebtebeten 10mo ago
    The old fashioned tech doesn't do much better; I did an image search on '"whitney tuck" cusp' and got back a picture of a VIA monograph. At least it was relevant! Pedantic exception: "Text" is good; "hypertext" is better