4 ms·

I wonder why Texas did not start by targeting NSFW / porn apps specifically, like other states. I also wonder why smut literature (the best selling category of

by Palmik 10mo ago

I wonder why Texas did not start by targeting NSFW / porn apps specifically, like other states. I also wonder why smut literature (the best selling category of books on Amazon) seems to get a free pass.

Nasrudith 10mo ago
Because people were so sick of their shit, and they already got their asses beaten so hard that they turned a fundamentalist city into an atheistic one. Banned in Boston used to be a thing. Boston itself got sick of that puritan bullshit. They know that re-litigating that is a road to ruin because 'artistic merit' is so well tread a ground in literature.
pjc50 10mo ago
The app stores already block porn on their own initiative. > I also wonder why smut literature (the best selling category of books on Amazon) seems to get a free pass. It's popular with women and basically invisible to men.
- pmdr 10mo ago
  And being long-form written text, likely invisible to minors as well.
  - AlotOfReading 10mo ago
    It's extremely visible to teenagers. They're one of the main audiences for booktok.
- Palmik 10mo ago
  There are plenty of NSFW oriented apps, especially in the AI category. > It's popular with women and basically invisible to men. Mostly true, and this might be a reflection of reality, but certainly not a justification.
TimByte 10mo ago
Text has always been treated differently than images or video, partly for historical reasons and partly because regulating it runs straight into classic First Amendment landmines
lacoolj 10mo ago
Probably because some apps aren't NSFW apps but have it (Reddit)
hombre_fatal 10mo ago
Text just fundamentally isn't nearly as graphic as images/video. Write the most sexually disturbing sentence you can come up with and it's going to be rather meh and possibly quite comical. And any of the gravity that it does have comes from the reader's ability to generate the visuals themself which is mostly out of reach for children who don't have the experience to necessarily know what's even being described.

by Palmik 10mo ago

Nasrudith 10mo ago

Because people were so sick of their shit, and they already got their asses beaten so hard that they turned a fundamentalist city into an atheistic one. Banned in Boston used to be a thing. Boston itself got sick of that puritan bullshit. They know that re-litigating that is a road to ruin because 'artistic merit' is so well tread a ground in literature.

pjc50 10mo ago

The app stores already block porn on their own initiative. > I also wonder why smut literature (the best selling category of books on Amazon) seems to get a free pass. It's popular with women and basically invisible to men.

pmdr 10mo ago
And being long-form written text, likely invisible to minors as well.
- AlotOfReading 10mo ago
  It's extremely visible to teenagers. They're one of the main audiences for booktok.
Palmik 10mo ago
There are plenty of NSFW oriented apps, especially in the AI category. > It's popular with women and basically invisible to men. Mostly true, and this might be a reflection of reality, but certainly not a justification.

TimByte 10mo ago

Text has always been treated differently than images or video, partly for historical reasons and partly because regulating it runs straight into classic First Amendment landmines

lacoolj 10mo ago

Probably because some apps aren't NSFW apps but have it (Reddit)

hombre_fatal 10mo ago

Text just fundamentally isn't nearly as graphic as images/video. Write the most sexually disturbing sentence you can come up with and it's going to be rather meh and possibly quite comical. And any of the gravity that it does have comes from the reader's ability to generate the visuals themself which is mostly out of reach for children who don't have the experience to necessarily know what's even being described.