>because they are unreliable, not because "there is not enough interest for someone to write a balanced article on it" That is not what I said. That quote was

>because they are unreliable, not because "there is not enough interest for someone to write a balanced article on it" That is not what I said. That quote was in relation to me saying that I don't think viewpoints are being suppressed. There just is naturally not enough interest from sources wikipedia consists reliable. In regards to notability, I would rather these topics not have articles at all since they aren't notable enough to have balanced coverage by secondary sources.