3 ms·
I don't think hanlon's razor applies to billionaires , unless the peter principle holds true all the way to the very top
by Aeglaecia 10mo ago
I don't think hanlon's razor applies to billionaires , unless the peter principle holds true all the way to the very top
- Nasrudith 10mo agoWhy wouldn't Peter Principle apply just because the magical financial threshold is crossed? This is Peter Principle in a textbook way, a promotion from managing companies to managing the government.
- Aeglaecia 10mo agomy original thesis is wrong - while musk may have petered up to the top, that doesnt imply his actions must also be attributed to stupidity. the error in the thesis is conflation of stupidity with the raw brutal strength of cancer
- 7bit 10mo agoWas he ever competent in something, tho?
- watersb 10mo agoAh. That would be the Dilbert Principle: > Unlike the Peter principle, the promoted individuals were not particularly good at any job they previously had, so awarding them a supervisory position is a way to remove them from the productive workflow. > An earlier formulation of this effect was known as Putt's Law (1981), credited to the pseudonymous author Archibald Putt ("Technology is dominated by two types of people, those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand."). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilbert_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilbert_principle