4 ms·
I also recommend that podcast but I would suggest balancing it with '5-4' podcast or 'strict scrutiny'. Sara and David do a very good job explaining both sides
by cmptrnerd6 10mo ago
I also recommend that podcast but I would suggest balancing it with '5-4' podcast or 'strict scrutiny'. Sara and David do a very good job explaining both sides and the law but there are times I think advisory opinions could spend more time on the arguments made by the other side or the weaker portions of their supported view.
- Forgeties79 10mo agoStrict scrutiny is fantastic
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]
- cvoss 9mo agoOof, I couldn't stand to make it through one episode of Strict Scrutiny. It was a political podcast dressed up as if it were a legal podcast. Not interested.
- Forgeties79 9mo agoYou can’t talk about the Supreme Court/US legal system and just omit politics. They also don’t make any sort of promise to be neutral or objective top to bottom. They aren’t judges making decisions, they’re talking about the law on a podcast.