3 ms·
No, the original definition of open-source is source code that is visible (open) to the public.
by phendrenad2 10mo ago
No, the original definition of open-source is source code that is visible (open) to the public.
- jibal 10mo agoCitation? On the contrary: https://opensource.org/osd https://opensource.org/osd
- phendrenad2 10mo agoI mean, I can buy opensource.co.net but that doesn't mean I can tell you how you can use the term. Need more of a citation to understand that..?
- jibal 10mo ago> I mean, I can buy opensource.co.net but that doesn't mean I can tell you how you can use the term. > Need more of a citation to understand that..? This nonsense is not at all relevant to the claim for which I asked for a citation: "No, the original definition of open-source is source code that is visible (open) to the public." No support for that claim has ever been offered.