3 ms·
i assume the downvoters don't see the importance of the question.
by kgwxd 10mo ago
i assume the downvoters don't see the importance of the question.
- watwut 10mo agoThe downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading. The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.
- mapontosevenths 10mo agoThey also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.
- mindslight 10mo agoI assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?
- mapontosevenths 10mo agoI know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.
- kgwxd 10mo agoI took the question to mean "were the easily circumvented redactions only covering victim details, and maybe suspects from Team Not-One-of-Us?" Implying the "stupidity" card was played to cover the "malice" card.