3 ms·
webp is smaller than jpeg https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study ALSO - the blog au
by wewewedxfgdf 10mo ago
webp is smaller than jpeg
https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study
ALSO - the blog author could simplify - you don't need any code at all at the web browser.
The <img> tag automatically does motion jpeg streaming.
- F3nd0 10mo ago… and JPEG XL is smaller than WebP.
- wewewedxfgdf 10mo agoJPEG XL looks to have pretty poor support. https://caniuse.com/jpegxl https://caniuse.com/jpegxl
- F3nd0 10mo agoYes, though hopefully not for long; unfortunately not all codecs are given equal treatment... If having native support in a web browser is important, though, then yes, WebP is a better choice (as is JPEG).
- deleted 10mo ago[deleted]