As off the wall as this kind of thinking is, I actually agree this is probably what Microsoft has to embrace, and this isn't even going far enough. Anyone who

As off the wall as this kind of thinking is, I actually agree this is probably what Microsoft has to embrace, and this isn't even going far enough. Anyone who has experience with LLMs knows that strong typing, static validation, and testing is how you get the most out of codegen. The kind of thing Rust is for. I can think of ways to do this gradually, that would actually work. It's something that would take years to see effects in a C++ codebase but I think the alternative of sticking with C++ is a dead end. Somewhat relevant: I chuckled at this (quite accurate) 2 hour overview of the unfixable problems with C++: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fGB-hjc2Gc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fGB-hjc2Gc. Unreliable source: I worked at Microsoft (on C++) many years ago and I've been writing C++ on/off for ~15 years.