3 ms·
There is also a good write-up [0] by Julia Evans. We ran into this with DICOM storescp, which is a chatty protocol and TCP_NODELAY=1 makes the throughput signif
by miduil 10mo ago
There is also a good write-up [0] by Julia Evans. We ran into this with DICOM storescp, which is a chatty protocol and TCP_NODELAY=1 makes the throughput significantly better. Since DICOM is often used in a LAN, that default just makes it unnecessarily worse.
[0]: https://jvns.ca/blog/2015/11/21/why-you-should-understand-a-little-about-tcp/ https://jvns.ca/blog/2015/11/21/why-you-should-understand-a-...
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10607422 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10607422
- eieio 10mo agoOh! Thank you for this! I love Julia’s writing but haven’t read this post.
- TZubiri 10mo agoI wonder how this fix could be implemented without source code access. Suppose an old ct scanner is clogging up the network.
- vbezhenar 10mo agohttps://github.com/sschroe/libnodelay https://github.com/sschroe/libnodelay
- tecleandor 10mo agoOh, DICOM really like to talk back and forth... I guess that nowadays it should be better with all the WEB/REST versions of the protocol.