3 ms·
Couple of points: 1) I understand the use case, but asking people to trust you with their twitter credentials is bad news bears. Isn't some combination of Open
by jacobscott 18y ago
Couple of points:
1) I understand the use case, but asking people to trust you with their twitter credentials is bad news bears. Isn't some combination of OpenID/OAuth supposed to fix this (once twitter gets around to it, or whatever)?
2) I think the intersection of digg with twitter is interesting (don't know if it is novel), and using a tweet tag is a clean way to do it.
3) Your design is pretty clean, don't know if I like the color scheme or name though.
4) Is "thoughtful tweet" an oxymoron? Is there a good use case for high SnR microblogging?
- adityakothadiya 18y ago1. I completely understand the issue with Twitter account credentials. That's why I kept it with minimal requirement - provide it only when you want to Post, Retweet or Reply. When I say we don't store your credentials, I do mean it. That's why I ask it every time it is needed. But as you said, once Twitter fixes it using OAuth or so, definitely I'll support it. 3. My idea was to keep the domain name short and find the one which is available :). So its' mix of Tweet + Thought = Tweeght. 4. I've seen many people just post their insights, interesting observations, inspiring quotes, etc. So is the idea :)