3 ms·
> If you're of the opinion that drawing children having sex (assuming again) shouldn't be illegal, you should be lobbying/advocating for that position. Changing
by samus 10mo ago
> If you're of the opinion that drawing children having sex (assuming again) shouldn't be illegal, you should be lobbying/advocating for that position. Changing the compromise. Otherwise you're, like me driving too fast, at the mercy of the justice system.
That only makes sense if your general stance to everything is "forbidden unless explicitly permitted". I hope I don't have to say why that sounds oppressive.
There is more than one way to achieve a compromise in society.
- delusional 10mo ago> That only makes sense if your general stance to everything is "forbidden unless explicitly permitted" Not at all. The UK, just as an example, explicitly bans images (as opposed to photographs, which are covered under different law) of children that are pornographic and obscene. That is, by legal professionals, interpreted as including manga, comics, and CGI. You do not need some universal "default position" to understand the laws as they currently exist.
- samus 10mo agoWhether such laws already exist or not was not my point. The problem is that such laws are overreaching in nature.