> Er, this is a copyright case. What does this have to do with patents? A concerted effort to bring everything under the umbrella of 'Intellectual Property', s

> Er, this is a copyright case. What does this have to do with patents? A concerted effort to bring everything under the umbrella of 'Intellectual Property', so they can claim that violating any of the laws relating to copyright, trademarks, trade dress, patents, and so on is morally equivalent to stealing $50 from an old lady. Maybe it would have worked better if they tried to equate it to rape, instead.