4 ms·
That's just a few parameters that you avoided having to tune, a few milliseconds of computer time. I'm not great, just questioning basic assumptions that have b
by marshallp 14y ago
That's just a few parameters that you avoided having to tune, a few milliseconds of computer time. I'm not great, just questioning basic assumptions that have been handed down from a time before computers were around.
- klodolph 14y agoYou keep on asserting that the task -- without domain knowledge of Shannon's theorem -- is solvable by computer. Can you describe how such a computer program would work? I'm unconvinced that the computer program would get a reasonable result before you run out of money paying for it.
- marshallp 14y agoThe Shannon theorem is basically voided by compressive sensing. But all of this (shannon+compressive) was a waste of practical people's time anyway. It's justification for pencil pushers who don't want to do real work.
- karategeek6 14y agohttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1orMXD_Ijbs&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1orMXD_Ijbs&feature=relat...
- darkarmani 14y ago> That's just a few parameters that you avoided having to tune, a few milliseconds of computer time. Really? What happens when you need to do a similar calculation across hundreds of millions of data points?