4 ms·
I understand this, but it coincidentally uses CO2 and it's hard for me to understand why the technology would sound "too good to be true" without imagining such
by zahlman 11mo ago
I understand this, but it coincidentally uses CO2 and it's hard for me to understand why the technology would sound "too good to be true" without imagining such a purpose.
- andruby 11mo agoIt's a one-time "use" though, it's not consuming CO2, so it's not going to move any needle