3 ms·

P.S. The response is filled with bad faith accusations.

• threethirtytwo 10mo ago
  Look at your response. You first dismissed me completely by saying I don’t know what technically means. Then you mischaracterization my statement as an intent to inflame. These are highly insulting and dismissive statements. You’re not willing to have good faith discussion. You took the worst possible interpretation of my statement and crafted a terse response to shut me down. I only did two things. First I explained myself… then I called you out for what you did while remaining civil. I don’t skirt around HN rules as a means to an end, which is what I believe you’re doing? I’m ok with what you’re doing… but I will call it out.
• jibal 10mo ago
  No surprise that the dishonesty and playing the victim is persistent. It's a fact that this person misuses the term "technically", and that they used inflammatory language. Saying so does not dismiss them completely ... but even if it did, so what? Doing so is not bad faith. No one has any obligation to engage with someone. I won't comment further.
  • threethirtytwo 10mo ago
    Indeed, don’t comment further: you didn’t even have the respect to respond to me directly. That is categorically deliberately inflammatory. Just respond to the guy you’re talking to like 99% of HN. Why avoid it? It’s a tactic, that’s why, and also pointless. I’m not a victim of anything. But you are definitely a perpetrator and instigator.