3 ms·
Planted by whom? That were not part of the files? That seems dubious at best. What is your source? It doesn't even make sense.
by epistasis 11mo ago
Planted by whom? That were not part of the files? That seems dubious at best. What is your source? It doesn't even make sense.
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- deleted 11mo ago[deleted]
- dboreham 11mo agoMakes sense if you are a criminal.
- 9dev 11mo agoThere is a picture of Bill Clinton with Michael Jackson and Diana Ross that was just publicly available before: https://www.threads.com/@meidastouch/post/DSfEKJslM1H https://www.threads.com/@meidastouch/post/DSfEKJslM1H It doesn't belong into the Epstein Files, and doesn't need to be censored either, but the way it is framed in the DoJ release implies guilt where there is none.
- _heimdall 11mo agoHow can you be sure the image wasn't part of the files collected during investigation? What makes you so sure Epstein didn't have the file saved somewhere on a device, server, or account that was collected?
- 9dev 11mo agoI don’t think I expressed a particular opinion here, I just stated where the suspicion comes from. That being said, I think we can demand a level of due diligence from public institutions that entails only censoring actual victims on actual pieces of evidence, instead of mindlessly placing black squares on the faces of news article pictures found on his computer. Nevermind that nobody can explain yet how this particular picture ended up in the grand jury files anyway.
- goatlover 11mo agoThis is the same DOJ that released the edited Epstein jail video as "raw", with the attorney general claiming the missing minute was from how the video system reset for a new day, when they had the actual raw video with the missing minute.
- _heimdall 11mo agoYes, though that was a different situation. If my wallet goes missing I'm not going to immediately blame a person while previously stole something with no other evidence.