2 ms·
You started with “not well explained by biology.” All of the evidence is solidly on one side, so you’ve retreated to “we can neither confirm nor deny.” I gues
by psyopsy 11mo ago
You started with “not well explained by biology.”
All of the evidence is solidly on one side, so you’ve retreated to “we can neither confirm nor deny.”
I guess that’s progress?
- __alexs 11mo agoAgain, those statements are not contradictory.
- psyopsy 11mo agoThey're not contradictory in a vacuum. But in this sequence, they show you're backpedaling. You opened with a firm claim, and when confronted with actual data, you retreated to 'we can't know.' Pretending that perfect certainty is required here is just a dodge.