2 ms·
We're talking about database performance here, not deployment numbers. And personally, I don't much care what Meta does, they're not pushing the envelope on rel
by koverstreet 10mo ago
We're talking about database performance here, not deployment numbers. And personally, I don't much care what Meta does, they're not pushing the envelope on reliability anywhere that I know of.
- evanelias 10mo agoMany other companies besides Meta use RocksDB; they're just the largest. Production adoption at scale is always relevant as a measure of stability, as well as a reflection of whether a solution is applicable to general-purpose workloads. There's more to the story than just raw performance anyway; for example Meta's migration to MyRocks was motivated by superior compression compared to other alternatives.