I was thinking the same but it's like they only used AI to handle the editing or something because even throwing it into ChatGPT "how could this article be impr

I was thinking the same but it's like they only used AI to handle the editing or something because even throwing it into ChatGPT "how could this article be improved: ${article}" gives: > Tighten the causal claim: “AI writes code → therefore judgment is scarce” As one of the first suggestions, so it's not something inherent to whether the article used AI in some way. Regardless, I care less about how the article got written and more about what conclusions really make sense.