3 ms·
802.1x is quite trivial to bypass if you have an authenticated device (in this case the intercom) that you can transparently bridge[1]. [1]. https://www.defcon
by onlydnaq 10mo ago
802.1x is quite trivial to bypass if you have an authenticated device (in this case the intercom) that you can transparently bridge[1].
[1]. https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-19/dc-19-presentations/Duckwall/DEFCON-19-Duckwall-Bridge-Too-Far.pdf https://www.defcon.org/images/defcon-19/dc-19-presentations/...
- tguvot 10mo agoit still will block or slow down many. 802.1x is commonly deployed with macsec. will it be also trivial to bypass ?
- justsomehnguy 10mo agoDid you ever seen an intercom or IP camera with macsec support?
- tguvot 10mo agoyes for example https://newsroom.axis.com/en-us/press-release/macsec-zero-trust https://newsroom.axis.com/en-us/press-release/macsec-zero-tr...
- justsomehnguy 10mo agoThat's great. Now we need to get an enterprise grade switch - doubt Cisco would add macsec into SOHO gear. Along with enterprise grade intercoms, cameras, doorbells... And beloved by many Unifi is out of question - they still can't bake IPv6 support. So looks like it's feasible but the cost wouldn't be good. ADD: also read this article: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41531699 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41531699
- tguvot 10mo agoi well familiar with macsec. we use it between datacenters and for aws directlink. it de-facto standard for this kind of stuff. i even worked on hardware that provided macsec support a couple of years ago I tried to use it inside datacenter during fedramp implementation. it crashed and burned for a couple of reasons: - linux wpa_supplicant was crashing during session establishment - switch had a limit on number of macsec session per port
- alexfoo 9mo agoLooks like some Ubiquiti UniFi switches (definitely SOHO) support 802.1x
- justsomehnguy 9mo ago802.1x != MACSEC