3 ms·

As someone who loves all the non-AI portions of Graphite (the CLI and the reviewer UI) should I be worried about this acquisition? Or will the CLI and Reviewer

As someone who loves all the non-AI portions of Graphite (the CLI and the reviewer UI) should I be worried about this acquisition? Or will the CLI and Reviewer Ui continue to be be maintained and improved?

jacobegold 10mo ago
Maintained, improved, and integrated. With more resources than ever. We're building whole platform. That's a lot more than just AI.
tombert 10mo ago
Forgive some ignorance, but we use Graphite at work, and I don't dislike it or anything, but I haven't really been able to see its appeal over just doing a PR within Github, at least if you exclude the AI stuff. What do you like about the non-AI parts? I mean it's a little convenient to be able to type `gt submit` in order to create the remote branch and the PR in one step, but it doesn't feel like anything that an alias couldn't do.
- dacox 10mo ago
  the stacked changes support, for me, was an absolute game changer. the auto rebasing, etc, is -really- nice. i found it especially useful for Gitops type stuff where you have to make lots of little PRs
  - surajrmal 10mo ago
    Is it better than just using jj locally though?
tomasreimers 10mo ago
No concerns! The plan is to maintain and improve both