3 ms·
That's fine, but it's a very different claim to the one you made at first. In particular, I don't know which parts of my data might get sent to Claude, so even
by Y_Y 10mo ago
That's fine, but it's a very different claim to the one you made at first.
In particular, I don't know which parts of my data might get sent to Claude, so even if I hope it's only a small fraction, anything could in principle be transmitted.
- linggen 10mo agoThat’s true — Linggen can’t control the behavior of Claude or any other cloud LLM. What it can control is the retrieval boundary: what gets selected locally and exposed to the model. If nothing is returned, nothing is sent. If a strict zero-exfiltration setup is required, then a fully local model would indeed be the right option.
- linggen 10mo agoI do have a local model path (Qwen3-4B) for testing. The tradeoff is simply model quality vs locality, which is why Linggen focuses on controlling retrieval rather than claiming zero data ever leaves the device. Using a local LLM is straightforward if that’s the requirement.