3 ms·
> but they're not mandating encryption backdoors https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_EC_DRBG#Weakness:_a_potential_backdoor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_E
by timschmidt 10mo ago
> but they're not mandating encryption backdoors
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_EC_DRBG#Weakness:_a_potential_backdoor https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual_EC_DRBG#Weakness:_a_poten...
- hypeatei 10mo agoYes, that was an insidious move from the NSA but nowhere near a mandate. No one uses it because of that weakness and they're allowed to do that.
- timschmidt 10mo agoMy understanding is that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_140-2 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FIPS_140-2 required Dual-EC DRBG to be implemented in any crypto system used by government, including such protocols as SSL/TLS, these algorithms are typically also adopted by industry, and NSA went further by paying RSA and perhaps others to make it the default in their security products. This came after previous attempts such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip