This seems like a reach: > Print inevitably precipitates a face-to-face community, giving it the capacity to represent and in turn catalyze real-world movement

This seems like a reach: > Print inevitably precipitates a face-to-face community, giving it the capacity to represent and in turn catalyze real-world movements. I've never gone to a people-who-read-$PERIODICAL party. Ever. Maybe it's common for pro-union zines that the author used to contribute to, but Popular Science, Newsweek, or the like don't have any corresponding community associated with them. There's no Architectural Digest-affiliated underground interior decorating scene. I think the author far overestimates the importance niche zines like the one they were a part of, or Palladium for that matter, have in the national dialogue.