3 ms·
Real programs have to do IO and the C and C++ code runs faster while also doing IO. What do you think they could have done better assuming that the IO is a nec
by pizlonator 10mo ago
Real programs have to do IO and the C and C++ code runs faster while also doing IO.
What do you think they could have done better assuming that the IO is a necessary part of the benchmark?
Also good job to the Rust devs for making the benchmark so much faster in nightly. I wonder what they did.
- Aurornis 10mo agoThe file I/O is probably irrelevant, but the startup time is not. The differences among the really fast languages are probably in different startup times if I had to guess.
- pizlonator 10mo ago> differences among the really fast languages are probably in different startup times Startup times matter a great deal.
- igouy 10mo agoWhat if we try to measure rather than guess :-) https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/nbodyinprocess.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...
- igouy 10mo ago> Assuming that the IO is a necessary part of the benchmark … So make it significant, move giga like benchmarks game reverse-complement & fasta & … https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/performance/revcomp.html https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/...