3 ms·
That solves bandwidth. It fails on tokens. JSON syntax is heavy. Brackets and quotes consume context window. More importantly, Schema.org is a dictionary of fac
by tsazan 9mo ago
That solves bandwidth. It fails on tokens.
JSON syntax is heavy. Brackets and quotes consume context window.
More importantly, Schema.org is a dictionary of facts. It lacks behavior. It defines what a product is, but not how to sell it.
It has no concept of @SEMANTIC_LOGIC or @BRAND_VOICE. We need a format that carries both data and instructions efficiently. JSON-LD is too verbose and too static for that.
- reddalo 9mo ago> JSON syntax is heavy. I'd say it's not heavy. JSON syntax is pretty lean compared to XML.
- tsazan 9mo agoJSON is lean for data exchange between machines. But in the LLM economy, the currency is tokens, not bytes. To an LLM tokenizer, every bracket and quote is a distinct cost. In our tests, this 'syntax tax' accounts for up to 30% of the payload. We chose a line-oriented format to minimize overhead and maximize the context window for actual commerce data.