4 ms·
They I understand it: There was a deal to ban TikTok unless ownership changes --- the original intention was no Chinese involvement, but now it seems "ownership
by beezlebroxxxxxx 10mo ago
They I understand it: There was a deal to ban TikTok unless ownership changes --- the original intention was no Chinese involvement, but now it seems "ownership change" means the ownership is amicable to the current president. There was also something of a grace period for when that ban went into effect if TikTok could show they were actively in the process of finding a new owner. The current president basically just kept insisting that grace period was in effect while he constructed a bid for ownership that aligned with his and his friends (business) interests.
Basically, Congress did not do its job and ignored the very law they voted for.
- mattnewton 10mo ago> Basically, Congress did not do its job and ignored the very law they voted for. It feels like this is increasingly the case. Not sure what the solutions are.
- Buttons840 10mo agoCongress can't really ignore a law though, anymore than I can. Am I ignoring the TikTok law? No, because it's not my job to enforce it. The executive branch is the one that ignores the law.
- pseudalopex 10mo agoCongress have the power to remove a president.