I do stuff with search engines, not AI agents. If this was based on your own index or if it was based on multiple sources and then re-ranked, I would have been

I do stuff with search engines, not AI agents. If this was based on your own index or if it was based on multiple sources and then re-ranked, I would have been more interested. Knowing that it’s just Google (+ web fetch) though I’m not interested in testing it. Probably you need people to test it who actually do stuff with agents. This hacker news post didn’t get any traction, it looks like it was just me who noticed. I’m not sure what works well to get people’s attention on here, but maybe you could try adding a new post on HN for each interesting update, and focus on the interesting new thing in the title. If you don’t have a bunch of updates planned, maybe you could find the most interesting and distinctive things about this product and then make a different post about each, I think that would be okay. Maybe you should read the HN terms first though. I think that may have been the problem, the title of the post doesn’t make it apparent what is new and interesting about the product, it just says what it is, which is part of a product category that already exists.