She was a blogger who used the platform of the internet to broadcast a previously-ignored voice and perspective. Because of that, she was shot as the regressiv

She was a blogger who used the platform of the internet to broadcast a previously-ignored voice and perspective. Because of that, she was shot as the regressive forces of control try to maintain their tenuous hold over information dissemination. Were the article simply "blogger shot for blogging" would anyone be questioning whether it belonged here? I doubt it.