3 ms·
Gleb from Backblaze here. The drives were literally the same inside the external enclosures. We bought a few to start with to check. We use consumer-grade driv
by budmang 14y ago
Gleb from Backblaze here. The drives were literally the same inside the external enclosures. We bought a few to start with to check.
We use consumer-grade drives across our entire 40+ petabyte storage farm because we do not need high-performance drives. Instead, we need low-cost, low-power, high-density drives to put into our custom-designed Storage Pods: http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v2-0revealing-more-secrets/ http://blog.backblaze.com/2011/07/20/petabytes-on-a-budget-v...
We tested "enterprise drives" and found that from a pure reliability perspective, they actually performed worse in our testing than the consumer drives. With about 5 years and 40+ petabytes of data, we're fairly confident this holds true.
Finally, we assume that all drives will fail and replace about 10 drives every week. The software is written such that the system takes drive failures into account and data is stored redundantly and continuously cross-checked.
- stephengillie 14y agoIt's interesting to find that "enterprise drives" performed worse than consumer. Recently, a report came from a Microsoft datacenter, where they found most errors weren't from faulty hardware, but firmware incompatibilities between array controller and drive controller. I wonder if this type of incompatibility occurs more often for enterprise drives than consumer.