It's a fair question. In situations involving formal legal demands and regulatory complaints, executive silence on social channels isn't unusual—it's a delibera

It's a fair question. In situations involving formal legal demands and regulatory complaints, executive silence on social channels isn't unusual—it's a deliberate risk-mitigation strategy. Engaging publicly or via direct message can create evidence and escalate visibility. The standard playbook is to keep serious disputes within formal, trackable channels (like legal@ email) or through counsel. My takeaway isn't about their silence on LinkedIn, but their continued silence across all formal channels after being served notice. That shifts the calculus from a support issue to a legal and reputational risk they are choosing to ignore