3 ms·

This is how Firefox fell behind Chrome and bled their entire market share. The strategy of letting Chrome out innovate them and then copy what they think is goo

This is how Firefox fell behind Chrome and bled their entire market share. The strategy of letting Chrome out innovate them and then copy what they think is good is not a strategy that works.

amethyst 11mo ago
It works pretty well for Apple
- charcircuit 11mo ago
  Not on desktop. They are losing market share to chrome year over year.
rightbyte 11mo ago
I'm quite sure only "we" care about esoteric browser features. "Does it have tabs? OK. Fine." Firefox losing market share were probably more due to Google nagging desktop users than features. What did Chrome have that Firefox didn't?
- charcircuit 11mo ago
  Not crashing frequently due to having proper tab isolation and a sane extention system.
- fasbiner 11mo ago
  You and your argument are reductionist.
noirscape 11mo ago
Firefox fell behind Chrome because of aggressive marketing from Google in a way that probably violates some antitrust laws if they were actually being enforced, combined with a couple of own-goals from Mozilla. Basically Google exploits their market dominance in Search and Mail to get people to use Chrome (and probably their other services too). When you search in a non-Chrome browser, you'll be constantly informed by Google about how much better their search is with Chrome through pop-ups and in-page notifications (not browser notifs). If you click a link in the Gmail app on iOS, rather than opening the browser, you get a Chrome advertisement if they detect it isn't your default browser. This goes hand-in-hand with Chrome being the default Android browser (don't underestimate the power of being the default) and Mozilla alienating their core audience of power users by forcibly inserting features that those power users despise. Chrome never won on features, it won on marketing and abuse of a different monopoly.

3 ms·

This is how Firefox fell behind Chrome and bled their entire market share. The strategy of letting Chrome out innovate them and then copy what they think is goo

by charcircuit 11mo ago

This is how Firefox fell behind Chrome and bled their entire market share. The strategy of letting Chrome out innovate them and then copy what they think is good is not a strategy that works.

amethyst 11mo ago
It works pretty well for Apple
- charcircuit 11mo ago
  Not on desktop. They are losing market share to chrome year over year.
rightbyte 11mo ago
I'm quite sure only "we" care about esoteric browser features. "Does it have tabs? OK. Fine." Firefox losing market share were probably more due to Google nagging desktop users than features. What did Chrome have that Firefox didn't?
- charcircuit 11mo ago
  Not crashing frequently due to having proper tab isolation and a sane extention system.
- fasbiner 11mo ago
  You and your argument are reductionist.
noirscape 11mo ago
Firefox fell behind Chrome because of aggressive marketing from Google in a way that probably violates some antitrust laws if they were actually being enforced, combined with a couple of own-goals from Mozilla. Basically Google exploits their market dominance in Search and Mail to get people to use Chrome (and probably their other services too). When you search in a non-Chrome browser, you'll be constantly informed by Google about how much better their search is with Chrome through pop-ups and in-page notifications (not browser notifs). If you click a link in the Gmail app on iOS, rather than opening the browser, you get a Chrome advertisement if they detect it isn't your default browser. This goes hand-in-hand with Chrome being the default Android browser (don't underestimate the power of being the default) and Mozilla alienating their core audience of power users by forcibly inserting features that those power users despise. Chrome never won on features, it won on marketing and abuse of a different monopoly.