3 ms·
Maybe he wanted to verify whether what I was saying was true and asked ChatGPT, then tried to be helpful by pasting the response here?
by efilife 10mo ago
Maybe he wanted to verify whether what I was saying was true and asked ChatGPT, then tried to be helpful by pasting the response here?
- phyzome 10mo agoYeah, I agree that that's likely the thought process. It just happens to be the opposite of helpful.
- cyphar 10mo agoMaybe I'm getting too jaded but I'm struggling to be quite that charitable. The entireity of the human-written text in that comment was "From ChatGPT:" and it was formatted as though it was a slam-dunk "you're wrong, the computer says so" (imagine it was "From Wikipedia" followed by a quote disagreeing with you instead). I'm sure some people do what you describe but then I would expect at least a little bit more explanation as to why they felt the need to paste a paragraph of LLM output into their comment. (While I would still disagree that it is in any way valuable, I would at least understand a bit about what they are trying to communicate.)
- ATechGuy 10mo agoThat's a fair criticism. My thought process was that the original comment was based on their personal experiences and since ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset, it may offer a different perspective derived from experiences of a lot more people. > "you're wrong, the computer says so" My thought: you're knowledge may be limited, this is what a computer trained on a lot more data says: